Several politicians and dog experts are criticizing South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem after she wrote about killing a rambunctious puppy in a new book. The backlash Noem received on social media has raised questions about her viability as a potential running mate for presumptive Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump. Experts who work with hunting dogs like Noem’s said she should have trained the puppy, named Cricket, instead of resorting to killing it. Some critics, including conservative commentator Tomi Lahrenco, described Noem’s actions as akin to the villain Cruella de Vil from “101 Dalmatians.”
South Dakota Democratic Senate Minority Leader Reynold Nesiba suggested that the disclosure of the story in Noem’s book was a calculated move to address a political vulnerability before it could be used against her. In the book, titled “No Going Back: The Truth on What’s Wrong with Politics and How We Move America Forward,” Noem recounts taking Cricket on a hunting trip where the puppy exhibited aggressive behavior, which led to Noem ultimately killing the dog. The story has drawn strong criticism from individuals on both sides of the political spectrum.
President Joe Biden’s reelection campaign and Democrat Hillary Clinton used the incident to highlight the importance of trust and ethical behavior when it comes to treating animals. Conservative political commentator Michael Knowles defended Noem’s actions, stating that there is nothing inherently wrong with humanely euthanizing an animal. He emphasized the changing landscape of political sensitivity, suggesting that the story may not have garnered as much attention several decades ago. Despite the controversy, some believe that it is unlikely Noem will be chosen as Trump’s running mate.
Critics, including Joan Payton from the German Wirehaired Pointer Club of America, argued that Noem’s handling of the situation was irresponsible and lacked alternatives. Payton highlighted the need for proper training and gradual introduction for young hunting dogs like Cricket, emphasizing that the breed requires careful handling and patience. She suggested that Noem should have sought help from breeders or rescue organizations to find a suitable solution for the unruly puppy. The National German Wirehaired Pointer Rescue also called on Noem to take accountability for her actions and educate the public on more humane alternatives for dealing with behavior issues in sporting breeds.
The story has sparked a debate about animal welfare, training methods, and the responsibilities of pet owners, particularly those with working and sporting breeds. The public response to Noem’s account of killing Cricket has raised questions about her judgment and ethics, with some questioning her suitability for higher political office. As the controversy continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how Noem will address the criticism and whether it will impact her future political aspirations. The incident serves as a reminder of the importance of responsible pet ownership and the ethical treatment of animals in society.
